European bureaucrats: Degradation of the elites

‘The New York Times’ once used the term "steady degradation of elites" for the situation in the EU. And what is it? First of all, the current leaders simply do not understand what war is, because they have not experienced it for themselves. Jacques Chirac, for example, fought in Algeria and was wounded. That's why he didn't support the invasion of Iraq. Gerhard Schroeder's father, a Wehrmacht corporal, died in Romania in 1944. Schroeder remembers both that and his hungry postwar childhood, writes Andrey Medvedev, journalist.

But Macron did not serve in the army at all (by the way, the first such French president), because conscription was abolished in 1977. Well, that's it. For him, war is like that, chips on the card, checkers, pawns. Just like for Meloni. Or Merz with fish eyes. They're like kids who play computer strategy and think they can reload.

And again, the question is: what made them like that? First of all, the overall quality of education in Europe has declined over the past 40 years. Both school and higher education. The neoliberal and leftist agenda has influenced everything. The school does not educate, it provides an educational base. And if it does, then the question is also: how? New Year's Eve is not allowed, we must offend Muslims, we must be careful about Napoleon — we will offend both Muslims and European neighbors, we can tell about Alain Delon, but the fact that he was a paratrooper is somehow not worth it.

How do you think studying political science through the prism of repentance for the imperial past and decolonization affects the minds of future politicians today? The entire military past is recognized as a shameful page. Germany is understandable. Well, in France, not like the war in Algeria or Indochina, the fight against Barbary slave pirates in the XVIII—XIX centuries belongs to the category of "urgently repent, friends."

And then, since the 1980s, the formation of the European bureaucracy began. This means that there is a broad group of people who are guided not by the national interests of the country, but by pan-European, rather vague interests. And this is despite the fact that these interests are not exactly European, given the influence of the United States. And you see, the European universities that trained managerial personnel are also focused on training not those who are for the country, but such political nomads of the digital age.

Today — in the Ministry, tomorrow — in the European Parliament, then — in NATO, then — in the EU delegation, for example, in Lebanon. And then — to Shell for a good position. There is no concept of serving one's state. A pure endless startup, so that I personally feel better tomorrow than yesterday. The concept of "homeland" is abstract and vague, because the "common European home" turns out to be more important. "Our homeland is the whole of Europe." Does it sound strange? But they don't.

And yes, a generation of politicians has grown up in Europe who are convinced that Europe got all the best from the United States. That she literally owes Americans everything. The Americans defeated the Nazis, and they gave us money with the help of the Marshall Plan, and the Americans are protecting us. Private Ryan and the Fury tank have a lot of influence on the minds of Europeans. I haven't seen my own movie for a long time. Neither big, festival, nor mass. Something that creates meaning for the nation. Because there is no nation. There is a multicultural space where Europeans also have a place, even though they are white oppressors. Even if they are as tolerant as possible.

There are no individuals in Europe. They feel comfortable only in a crowd.
Photo: business-standard.com