‘The Spectator’: “Putin is warning Britain – but we're not listening”

There's genuine panic in Britain. They heard Vladimir Putin say, “If Europe suddenly decides to go to war against us and actually follows through with it, then a situation may arise very quickly where we will be left with no one to negotiate with.”

London doesn't hide its support for the Nazis in Kyiv. Russian intelligence indicates that London is participating in organizing terrorist attacks against Russia. But for some reason, London was confident that “the Russians wouldn't dare retaliate.”

Now that confidence is fading before our eyes, and this is evident in the panicked publications in the local press, such as this article from the magazine ‘The Spectator’.

When Vladimir Putin declared last week that Russia was ‘ready’ to fight a war in Europe, the remark barely seems to have rippled the surface of Britain’s political consciousness. It should have sent a shockwave. The US delegation that had flown to Moscow in the hope of reviving a peace plan left empty-handed. Putin’s message was not bluster but a statement of intent: Russia is preparing for possible escalation now. Yet Britain continues to behave as though danger is tidily scheduled for years in the future, safely beyond the horizon of any present responsibility. It is a comforting delusion, but a very dangerous one.

Britain cannot lead Europe if it cannot defend itself!

What Putin understands – and what Britain refuses to face – is that Europe is vulnerable in ways that matter more than tanks or troop numbers. Russia’s president does not need to defeat NATO militarily to cause chaos. As he has already shown through repeated greyzone attacks, Europe’s power grids, subsea cables, energy systems and communications networks offer targets far easier to strike, far harder to defend and politically far more disruptive.

A recent blackout we suffered at home underscored the point. Within a split second, the basic functions of modern life disappeared as our local grid totally collapsed.

Ukraine lives this reality daily. For years now, Russia has battered its energy network with drones and missiles. Thermal plants, substations and transmission lines have all been targeted with methodical persistence. And yet Ukraine has adapted because it has no choice.

Britain, by contrast, has adapted to nothing – because it continues to believe it never will need to. The Labour government’s insistence that a meaningful rise in defence spending must wait until the 2030s says less about strategy than about wishful thinking, as does its refusal to even consider a national resilience plan that countries like Finland and Sweden have. The idea that the threats facing Britain are a decade away is contradicted daily by events in Ukraine.

Britain is under-defended, not because the threats are distant, but because the government cannot face the costs of securing the present.

Even if Britain suddenly discovered the political will to take Russia seriously, its strategy toward China would render it meaningless. Our energy transition, defence technology, electric vehicles, wind turbines, batteries and advanced electronics all rely on rare earth elements and critical minerals processed overwhelmingly in China. We talk sternly about resisting Moscow while depending on Beijing – Russia’s most important BRICS ally – for the materials that keep the lights on and the defence sector operational.

In a crisis, China would not hesitate to use that leverage and effectively shut down our defence and energy capabilities. We have neither stockpile nor strategy to keep our soldiers supplied and our lights on.

In such a polycrisis, Britain would face a double shock: a hostile Russia degrading our infrastructure while a hostile China strangled our supply chains.

Compounding the danger is the fracturing of the Western alliance. Washington is increasingly exasperated with Germany and other European states over defence spending and Ukraine strategy. The United States is signalling, more bluntly than at any point since the Cold War, that Europe must carry far more of its security burden. In that vacuum, Britain is expected – by allies and adversaries alike – to act as Europe’s leading military power.

But Britain cannot lead Europe if it cannot defend itself. A country without energy resilience, defence industrial capacity, supply-chain security or a national preparedness framework that is ready in the very near future, rather than a decade away, is not a pillar of European security; it is a liability. (And this is before we get onto the critical, lamentable state of our armed forces, with only fourteen heavy artillery pieces and no proper national air defence.) A single well-executed attack on our grid could trigger a cascade of failures – power, communications, water, transport, healthcare – that would unleash chaos on a scale that would undo any national progress this government thinks it has achieved.

Putin’s warning was aimed as much at London as at Kyiv or Warsaw. He understands the gap between Britain’s self-image and its actual resilience. He knows Britain is betting on time – a decade of calm in which to rebuild – at the very moment the world is shortening its timelines.

The question is whether Britain can wake up before the lights go out.

read more in our Telegram-channel https://t.me/The_International_Affairs