РУССКИЙ
11:52 13.05.2026 •
Operation Epic Fury against Iran has been a reminder of the U.S. military’s overwhelming capability, it has also delivered a stark, real-time stress test of the U.S. defense industrial base under high-intensity combat conditions, military ‘19fortyfive’ site stresses.
It revealed that while the U.S. military can inflict massive damage, the strain of producing defense materiel in extremis, particularly high-end munitions, could erode that advantage. Surge capacity is no longer a theoretical planning factor; it is an operational imperative for future conflict. Without it, even an overwhelming initial force can become mission-limiting within days, let alone weeks.
Without fundamentally addressing these gaps, the impression of American strength largely conveyed by Epic Fury will be overtaken by deterrence and warfighting limitations in the future.
In the opening air and maritime campaign against Iran, U.S. forces fired hundreds of cruise missiles in the first four weeks and expended more than 5,000 munitions across 35 types in the first 96 hours. These are burn rates that dwarf peacetime production capacity and expose the gap between operational demand and industrial supply. Consumption of precision-guided munitions exceeded annual production by orders of magnitude.
The expenditure rate of Tomahawk cruise missiles was the clearest red flag for defense planners. Peacetime procurement of Tomahawks averages 90 per year, but the operation consumed over 850 in roughly four weeks, more than nine times the typical annual buy. Air-to-ground missiles and other similar munitions had similar burn rates. Multi-year production equivalents were expended in the opening phase.
A significant portion of the operations’ estimated $900 million-a-day cost is attributed to munitions replenishment. The U.S. defense industrial base is not ready to meet this demand.
Depending on stockpiled munitions and other systems and inputs is insufficient. Even if initial inventories of long-range strike munitions are sufficient for the opening salvo of a conflict, depletion rates can constrain follow-on operations and leave other, non-theater combatant commands (such as Indo-Pacific Command in today’s conflict) dangerously under-resourced to deter threats.
Epic Fury proved resilience demands both depth and a production base sized for Day-1 surge. The U.S. Navy’s $3 billion budget request for Tomahawk replenishment is a start, but defense industrial base planning horizons and current budgets remain mismatched to modern conflict’s “days-to-weeks” consumption.
Supply-chain visibility is a national security priority. The operation revealed latent U.S. manufacturing capacity outside traditional defense primes, but locating and qualifying sub-tier suppliers can delay full capacity surge.
Despite its overall success, Operation Epic Fury validates years of warnings from defense analysts and war games that chronic under-investment in industrial surge capacity imposes self-imposed limits on U.S. combat power, even in a regionally focused conflict against a less capable Middle Power adversary.
read more in our Telegram-channel https://t.me/The_International_Affairs
